03/31/2019 ~ Fourth Sunday in Lent ~ Joshua 5:9-12; Psalm 32; 2 Corinthians 5:16-21; Luke 15:1-3, 11b-32.
Supernatural
“From now on, therefore, we regard no one from what might be called a human point of view, mere human judgment. Even if we did once regard Christ in these terms, that is not how we know Christ now.” — 2 Corinthians 5:16.
Last week I started off my comments with these words: “Many of you know this. I’ve probably said it hundreds of times.” I then referred to being a proud graduate of Bangor Theological Seminary.
What I want to say this week you have also heard me say probably hundreds of times. The faith tradition of my youth was Roman Catholic.
My first 10 years of schooling— First Grade through Sophomore year in High School— were all spent in parochial schools, Catholic Schools. The first six years of that schooling were in the same grade school, one connected with the local parish church my family attended.
It’s the name of the parish church, hence, it’s the name of the grade school, I want to mention. The church, the grade school, had what many would see as a horrible even somewhat frightening name: Fourteen Holy Martyrs— Fourteen Holy Martyrs grade school, Fourteen Holy Martyrs church.
Goggle that name— Fourteen Holy Martyrs— and the church and school show up. This group of saints, a grouping which dates from the 14th century in the Rhineland, was just that— a grouping.
These saints did not live in the 14th Century. This grouping of saints were not even alive at the same time. All of them also, by far, predated the 14th Century but got grouped together in that era.
They were grouped together and venerated because people were encouraged to pray for the intercession of these saints with God. The influence of that intercession was believed to be effective in multiple forms of healing. And the healing being sought in the 14th Century was quite specific: healing from bubonic plague, the Black Death.
Now, when you look up these 14 saints what you find out is in Germany, in the Rhineland, they were not known as Fourteen Holy Martyrs. They were called Fourteen Holy Helpers.
And each of them were connected to a specific healing, each saint connected to a different healing— fever, diseases of the eye, etc, etc. In short, in terms of Catholic tradition, the intercession of these saints on behalf of people helped cure various diseases. I suppose since the bubonic plague was so horrific, any kind of healing would do.
That having been said, one does have to wonder what in the American psyche translated the name of these fourteen saints from “Helpers” to “Martyrs.” This is especially true since, in the legends of these saints— and these saints are not particularly traceable to real people but were legends— in the legends of these saints none of them appear to have actually suffered a martyr’s death.
To be clear, I labeled that Fourteen Holy Martyrs name as horrible since I sometimes still wonder what kind of effect a name like that had on impressionable youngsters attending a grade school thusly named. Did that name somehow traumatize them for life? Did that name mean some of the students might think that they, themselves, were also headed for martyrdom?
Some probably did think that. Not I. If one takes theology seriously one does not indulge in that kind of transference and early on I already took theology seriously.
I make that statement about taking theology seriously because what I am about to say happened when I was in the Fourth Grade, or at least that’s what my memory says. Even if that memory is slightly inaccurate, I know it happened when I was still attending Fourteen Holy Martyrs since I also know in the Seventh Grade I switched schools and started to attend Saint Ignatius Loyola Grade School. So this happened no later than the Sixth Grade; I think earlier.
In any case, around that point in time I got into a deep theological discussion with my parents. I stated the premise that the grace of God is not natural, not normal. The grace of God is outside what is natural, outside of what is normal.
Further, that the grace of God is, itself, a gift from God is not normal either. Why” Grace is a free gift and there is nothing normal about a free gift. So if the grace of God is not natural it is, thereby... supernatural. Natural is what we humans do; supernatural is the work of God, said I. (Slight pause.)
We find these words in the work known as Second Corinthians: “From now on, therefore, we regard no one from what might be called a human point of view, mere human judgment. Even if we did once regard Christ in these terms, that is not how we know Christ now.” (Slight pause.)
In the Roman Catholic tradition two kinds of grace are identified— Actual Grace and Sanctifying Grace. I won’t get into the differences here. Neither I nor you have that kind of time today.
So, let’s get right to the point. What is grace? The Roman definition, that is the Roman Catholic definition says grace is the supernatural help of God granted in and through the reality of the Christ. [1]
This is not to say the grace of God only happened after the birth of Christ. The grace of God can be found all over Scripture.
Indeed, the Roman church, itself, says the grace of God was available before Christ. God is, after all, God. Rule one— do not put God in a box. Rule 2— see rule one: do not put God in a box.
But that very thought— not placing God in a box— brings us to Paul’s writing. Something common in all the lectionary readings assigned for today, but especially in the Corinthians and in the parables found in Luke, is that joy is available in the restorative love of God.
I need to be clear: joy is not happiness. We get happiness from having fun or doing something we like. Joy is found only in deep, lasting, full relationships, especially a deep, lasting, full relationship with God.
The reality of that joy happens because the Christ has opened up a new way of knowing, says Paul. The Christ has opened up a new way to see a new world.
Further, in the Christ the reconciling love of God is clearly revealed. And then Paul pushes this idea still one more step.
Paul’s claim is that because of the grace of God we— we— are commissioned to be engaged in the ministry of reconciliation, ambassadors for God in the ministry of reconciliation. This is not natural. This not what humans do normally. This is supernatural. (Slight pause.)
One of my commentaries on this reading says (quote:) “Nothing may be more difficult for Christians in North America than adopting the new way of discernment inherent in the gospel.” Why? (Quote:) “To be reconciled to God means to be an agent of reconciliation... for the world.”
Please note: the words from this commentary were not ripped from recent headlines. This commentary is many, many years old. (Slight pause.)
Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a German pastor, theologian, an anti-Nazi dissident. The writings of Bonhoeffer on the role of Christianity have become widely influential.
The book The Cost of Discipleship has been described as a modern classic. Bonhoeffer died in a Nazi concentration camp on April 9, 1945, just before the end of WWII. Hence, Bonhoeffer was a martyr, a martyr of the Christian faith.
In a sermon on Second Corinthians Bonhoeffer said this (quote:) “Christendom adjusts itself far too easily to the worship of power. Christians should give more offense, shock the world far more than they are doing now. Christians should take a stronger stand in favor of the weak rather than considering first the possible right of the strong.” (Slight pause.)
What was Bonhoeffer getting at? What was Paul getting at? I may be wrong but I think they are getting at... the supernatural. (Quote:) “...through Christ, the world was fully reconciled to God, who did not hold our transgressions against us— who did not hold our transgressions against us— but instead entrusted us with this message of reconciliation.”
If that does not turn the world as we know it upside down, I do not know what does. That is not natural. That is supernatural.
For we humans that we are empowered by God, entrusted by God to be a part of reconciliation is supernatural. It is a gift of God, the work of God. Question: are we willing to participate in the work God sets before us? Amen.
03/31/2019
United Church of Christ, Norwich, NY
ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “This saying has been going around. I think it applies. ‘Our job is not to judge others. Our job is not to figure out if someone is deserving of something. Our job is to lift those who are fallen. Our job is to restore those who are broken. Our job is to heal those who are hurting.’ Simply striving to do that it is supernatural and will, by the power of acting in that way, turn the world as we know it upside down. Here’s another way to put it. As theologians we need to understand theology is not a hammer. Hammers are only good at hitting nails. Our theology is not a hammer. Our theology needs to be glue which mends the world and holds it together.”
BENEDICTION: Let us seek to love as we have been loved by God, welcoming our brothers and sisters. Let us rejoice in God’s goodness and steadfast love. Let us follow where God leads. Let us go on our way with Christ as our companion. And may the steadfast love of God and the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.
[1]
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06689x.htm
Sunday, March 31, 2019
Sunday, March 24, 2019
SERMON ~ 03/24/2019 ~ Third Sunday in Lent ~ “Radical Christianity”
READINGS: 03/24/2019 ~ Third Sunday in Lent ~ Isaiah 55:1-9; Psalm 63:1-8; 1 Corinthians 10:1-13; Luke 13:1-9 ~ Note: 1 Corinthians 1:18-28 Added.
Radical Christianity
“...the message about the cross is foolishness, complete absurdity, to those who are perishing, headed for ruin, but to us who are being saved, experiencing salvation, it is the power of God.” — 1 Corinthians 1:18.
Many of you know this. I’ve probably said it hundreds of times. I am a proud graduate of Bangor Theological Seminary, Bangor, Maine. I have often said one of the very positive things about attending Bangor Theological Seminary was, before I was called to the be the Associate at a five church cooperative in Waldo County, Maine, I got a chance to do a lot of preaching.
The reason I got that chance is twofold. First, I a took a course in preaching which qualified me to be on a list of supply preachers kept by the Seminary. Second, Bangor Seminary, the city of Bangor itself, is in a rural area of a rural state.
Therefore, especially in Northern Maine, there are many, many small churches in many, many tiny rural towns— crossroads really— churches which accessed the Seminary preaching supply list. They relied on Seminary students for Sunday fill-in when necessary. Some of those churches used only that supply list Sunday to Sunday.
Hence, in the two years before I accepted the call to the Waldo County Cooperative— 104 Sundays— I preached 47 times in 23 locations. Obviously, 47 Sundays is nearly half the number of Sundays in the course of those two years. And that this supply work happened in 23 locations tells you I was called back to the same churches a lot. (Slight pause.)
So, have you ever been to Aroostook County, Maine? Aroostook is the largest county by area east of the Rocky Mountains. And early one Sunday morning Bonnie and I were on a long drive headed north to a church up in “The County” as it is known locally. I had a supply assignment.
She was driving and I was reading a text book. It was a theology text book. I had an exam the next day. Have you ever read a theology text book?
If you think the writing of Paul is dense, you have never read a current theology text book. One paragraph struck me as being particularly dense. So I turned to Bonnie and said, “Let me read this paragraph for you and please tell me if you understand what the author is getting at.”
And I did— I read it out loud to Bonnie. And when I had read it to myself or when I read it out loud for Bonnie to hear, she was not and I was not able to understand what the author was getting at. And indeed, whether we are talking about the Apostle Paul writing on theology two millennia ago or a current writer of theology, theology is, by its nature, is dense, hard to understand, hard to comprehend.
I was reminded of that incident of reading a paragraph to Bonnie a couple of weeks ago when I was mentoring a young pastor. That pastor told me Seminary taught them it was their duty to preach the Gospel. I took exception to that statement.
The work of a pastor, said I, is not just preach the Gospel but to help people understand the Gospel. If it’s your duty to preach the Gospel and no one understands what you say, that’s not going to help them or you. (Slight pause.)
I would be the first to say sometimes I am successful at helping people understand the Gospel, sometimes not so much. I also would be the first to say helping people understand the Gospel is something I try to learn and to do afresh every week. (Slight pause.)
And these are words found in the work known as First Corinthians: “...the message about the cross is foolishness, complete absurdity, to those who are perishing, headed for ruin, but to us who are being saved, experiencing salvation, it is the power of God.” (Slight pause.)
Well this is evident: Paul has a message to convey. (Quote:) “...the message about the cross...” But how are we to understand Paul’s message about the cross these two millennia later?
Perhaps we need to ask ‘what was Paul’s message?’ Was it as radical as Paul seems to be claiming in this passage— (quote:) “Has not God turned the wisdom of this world into folly?”
Indeed, how radical is Christianity? Our resident theologian, the one who makes things sound so complex, is the Apostle Paul. And certainly, what is clear amidst the complexity is this: a central topic in this passage is salvation.
But what did salvation mean to Paul? This seems to be evident: salvation meant one is saved from the powers which destroy— the powers which destroy— that’s commonly referred to as sin— one is saved from the powers which destroy and the consequences of the powers which destroy.
Now, there is something we need to remember here, something I have said numerous times. The earliest followers of Jesus were Jews. Paul was a Jew. Jesus was a Jew.
What was salvation for the Jews? For Jews salvation refers to the redeeming action of God in saving the people of Israel from their various exiles.
However, that salvation is not limited to the ancient exiles of Israel. Salvation also includes the present exile— an exile from God. Hence, coming back to that thing so many call sin, one is saved from the powers which destroy... now.
One is saved from this exile, an exile from God not in some afterlife but now, right now. (Slight pause.)
I know: all that sounds like theology. It teeters toward the complex, not easy to understand. So let me try to untangle that just a little. (Slight pause.)
Is the love of God absolute and unconditional? There are obviously different ways to speak of divine love but salvation always comes down to that question: ‘is the love of God absolute and unconditional?’
A plethora of biblical passages from both the Hebrew Scriptures and the Christian Scriptures can be invoked to support positions which say God’s love is unconditional. Equally a plethora of biblical passages from both the Hebrew Scriptures and the Christian Scriptures can be invoked to support positions which say God’s love is limited, conditional. But the important question is not the biblical texts we cite.
The important question is ‘which texts are to be given priority?’ So, within the expanse of Biblical revelation we have to ask what vision governs our reading of Scripture?
If we believe the love God offers is conditional, limited, then we’ll read Scripture one way. If we believe the love God offers is unconditional, unlimited, then we’ll read Scripture another way.
So the question here is not the texts or how many we cite to support one position or the other. That is simply not relevant because there is an obvious logical, to say nothing of theological, problem with claiming the love of God is wrapped up in conditions.
The problem is to read the texts in a transactional way turns God into a broker, a salesperson, a banker, an divine entity who makes deals. Conditions do not address love. Conditions turn love into a mere transaction.
Therefore one simple question needs to be asked: is God the very God we Christians claim God to be? Or should God be described as a divinity who deals in reward and punishment? Here’s another way to put it: is God that radical, so radical that God loves unconditionally? (Slight pause.)
Let me tell you who often deals in the kind of transactions we think of as reward and punishment. Let me tell you who often deals in brokering.
That would be us— homo sapiens, humans. Do we want God to be God— or do we want God to be human, just like us?
You do know the old joke line: God created us in God’s own image and we returned the favor. We need to stop returning that favor. We need to stop turning God into us.
And, if truth be told, we humans are transactional. We too often deal in a kind of love which can only be labeled as transactional. There is no doubt about this: we humans make all kinds of deals around relationship.
And I think, at least in part, that’s Paul’s point. God is so radical that, when it comes to love, God does not deal in transactions.
And yes, that is hard for we humans to understand. But I hope I helped a little with some understanding in these last minutes. If I didn’t I apologize and I shall give it another try next week.
That having been said, I don’t care how complex Paul or any other theologian is. It really all comes down to just this: God loves us. God loves us and wants to be in covenant with us.
Are we ready to accept a God Who is that radical? Are we ready to accept a Christianity which is that radical? Amen.
ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “A couple minutes ago I said ‘God loves us and wants to be in covenant with us.’ That can be labeled as covenant love. And it is a radical idea. God also wants us to be in covenant with one another. That can also be called covenant love. And that can also be labeled as a radical idea. So, this is the bottom line about theology: it doesn’t have to be as complex as we make it out to be— talk about a radical idea— because it is this simple: love God; love neighbor. And let’s check in with that radical idea once I awhile and try to keep it as un-transactional as possible.”
BENEDICTION: God’s steadfast love endures forever. Let us live our days offering thanks to God who feeds our souls. Let us go on our way with Christ as our companion. And may the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.
Radical Christianity
“...the message about the cross is foolishness, complete absurdity, to those who are perishing, headed for ruin, but to us who are being saved, experiencing salvation, it is the power of God.” — 1 Corinthians 1:18.
Many of you know this. I’ve probably said it hundreds of times. I am a proud graduate of Bangor Theological Seminary, Bangor, Maine. I have often said one of the very positive things about attending Bangor Theological Seminary was, before I was called to the be the Associate at a five church cooperative in Waldo County, Maine, I got a chance to do a lot of preaching.
The reason I got that chance is twofold. First, I a took a course in preaching which qualified me to be on a list of supply preachers kept by the Seminary. Second, Bangor Seminary, the city of Bangor itself, is in a rural area of a rural state.
Therefore, especially in Northern Maine, there are many, many small churches in many, many tiny rural towns— crossroads really— churches which accessed the Seminary preaching supply list. They relied on Seminary students for Sunday fill-in when necessary. Some of those churches used only that supply list Sunday to Sunday.
Hence, in the two years before I accepted the call to the Waldo County Cooperative— 104 Sundays— I preached 47 times in 23 locations. Obviously, 47 Sundays is nearly half the number of Sundays in the course of those two years. And that this supply work happened in 23 locations tells you I was called back to the same churches a lot. (Slight pause.)
So, have you ever been to Aroostook County, Maine? Aroostook is the largest county by area east of the Rocky Mountains. And early one Sunday morning Bonnie and I were on a long drive headed north to a church up in “The County” as it is known locally. I had a supply assignment.
She was driving and I was reading a text book. It was a theology text book. I had an exam the next day. Have you ever read a theology text book?
If you think the writing of Paul is dense, you have never read a current theology text book. One paragraph struck me as being particularly dense. So I turned to Bonnie and said, “Let me read this paragraph for you and please tell me if you understand what the author is getting at.”
And I did— I read it out loud to Bonnie. And when I had read it to myself or when I read it out loud for Bonnie to hear, she was not and I was not able to understand what the author was getting at. And indeed, whether we are talking about the Apostle Paul writing on theology two millennia ago or a current writer of theology, theology is, by its nature, is dense, hard to understand, hard to comprehend.
I was reminded of that incident of reading a paragraph to Bonnie a couple of weeks ago when I was mentoring a young pastor. That pastor told me Seminary taught them it was their duty to preach the Gospel. I took exception to that statement.
The work of a pastor, said I, is not just preach the Gospel but to help people understand the Gospel. If it’s your duty to preach the Gospel and no one understands what you say, that’s not going to help them or you. (Slight pause.)
I would be the first to say sometimes I am successful at helping people understand the Gospel, sometimes not so much. I also would be the first to say helping people understand the Gospel is something I try to learn and to do afresh every week. (Slight pause.)
And these are words found in the work known as First Corinthians: “...the message about the cross is foolishness, complete absurdity, to those who are perishing, headed for ruin, but to us who are being saved, experiencing salvation, it is the power of God.” (Slight pause.)
Well this is evident: Paul has a message to convey. (Quote:) “...the message about the cross...” But how are we to understand Paul’s message about the cross these two millennia later?
Perhaps we need to ask ‘what was Paul’s message?’ Was it as radical as Paul seems to be claiming in this passage— (quote:) “Has not God turned the wisdom of this world into folly?”
Indeed, how radical is Christianity? Our resident theologian, the one who makes things sound so complex, is the Apostle Paul. And certainly, what is clear amidst the complexity is this: a central topic in this passage is salvation.
But what did salvation mean to Paul? This seems to be evident: salvation meant one is saved from the powers which destroy— the powers which destroy— that’s commonly referred to as sin— one is saved from the powers which destroy and the consequences of the powers which destroy.
Now, there is something we need to remember here, something I have said numerous times. The earliest followers of Jesus were Jews. Paul was a Jew. Jesus was a Jew.
What was salvation for the Jews? For Jews salvation refers to the redeeming action of God in saving the people of Israel from their various exiles.
However, that salvation is not limited to the ancient exiles of Israel. Salvation also includes the present exile— an exile from God. Hence, coming back to that thing so many call sin, one is saved from the powers which destroy... now.
One is saved from this exile, an exile from God not in some afterlife but now, right now. (Slight pause.)
I know: all that sounds like theology. It teeters toward the complex, not easy to understand. So let me try to untangle that just a little. (Slight pause.)
Is the love of God absolute and unconditional? There are obviously different ways to speak of divine love but salvation always comes down to that question: ‘is the love of God absolute and unconditional?’
A plethora of biblical passages from both the Hebrew Scriptures and the Christian Scriptures can be invoked to support positions which say God’s love is unconditional. Equally a plethora of biblical passages from both the Hebrew Scriptures and the Christian Scriptures can be invoked to support positions which say God’s love is limited, conditional. But the important question is not the biblical texts we cite.
The important question is ‘which texts are to be given priority?’ So, within the expanse of Biblical revelation we have to ask what vision governs our reading of Scripture?
If we believe the love God offers is conditional, limited, then we’ll read Scripture one way. If we believe the love God offers is unconditional, unlimited, then we’ll read Scripture another way.
So the question here is not the texts or how many we cite to support one position or the other. That is simply not relevant because there is an obvious logical, to say nothing of theological, problem with claiming the love of God is wrapped up in conditions.
The problem is to read the texts in a transactional way turns God into a broker, a salesperson, a banker, an divine entity who makes deals. Conditions do not address love. Conditions turn love into a mere transaction.
Therefore one simple question needs to be asked: is God the very God we Christians claim God to be? Or should God be described as a divinity who deals in reward and punishment? Here’s another way to put it: is God that radical, so radical that God loves unconditionally? (Slight pause.)
Let me tell you who often deals in the kind of transactions we think of as reward and punishment. Let me tell you who often deals in brokering.
That would be us— homo sapiens, humans. Do we want God to be God— or do we want God to be human, just like us?
You do know the old joke line: God created us in God’s own image and we returned the favor. We need to stop returning that favor. We need to stop turning God into us.
And, if truth be told, we humans are transactional. We too often deal in a kind of love which can only be labeled as transactional. There is no doubt about this: we humans make all kinds of deals around relationship.
And I think, at least in part, that’s Paul’s point. God is so radical that, when it comes to love, God does not deal in transactions.
And yes, that is hard for we humans to understand. But I hope I helped a little with some understanding in these last minutes. If I didn’t I apologize and I shall give it another try next week.
That having been said, I don’t care how complex Paul or any other theologian is. It really all comes down to just this: God loves us. God loves us and wants to be in covenant with us.
Are we ready to accept a God Who is that radical? Are we ready to accept a Christianity which is that radical? Amen.
ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “A couple minutes ago I said ‘God loves us and wants to be in covenant with us.’ That can be labeled as covenant love. And it is a radical idea. God also wants us to be in covenant with one another. That can also be called covenant love. And that can also be labeled as a radical idea. So, this is the bottom line about theology: it doesn’t have to be as complex as we make it out to be— talk about a radical idea— because it is this simple: love God; love neighbor. And let’s check in with that radical idea once I awhile and try to keep it as un-transactional as possible.”
BENEDICTION: God’s steadfast love endures forever. Let us live our days offering thanks to God who feeds our souls. Let us go on our way with Christ as our companion. And may the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.
Sunday, March 17, 2019
SERMON ~ Second Sunday in Lent ~ “Covenant Made”
READINGS: 03/17/2019 ~ Second Sunday in Lent ~ Genesis 15:1-12, 17-18; Psalm 27; Philippians 3:17-4:1; Luke 13:31-35 or Luke 9:28-36, (37-43a) ~ Note: Saint Patrick’s Day.
Covenant Made
“On that day Yahweh, God, made a covenant with Abram...” — Genesis 15:18.
It happens all the time. People enter our lives. Then we move on or they move on and in a sense we forget them. But do we?
I was recently reminded twice in one week of someone who was in my life 40 years ago. And I was reminded of this person because of conversations I had with two friends at two different times. Things they said brought this person to mind.
Why did that happen? I don’t know. But when, for whatever reason, something like that does happen my sense is I’m supposed to pay attention.
This person’s name was Caterina Jarboro. She was an African-American classical singer. She died in 1986 at the age of 90.
I looked up her obituary in the New York Times to see if the facts stated there jibed with my memory. [1] Generally they did. But I have more detail from the stories she told me then the Times offered, so let me share some recollections.
I met Caterina when I was working with the Actor’s Fund of America. She was a volunteer. Some of what she told me refers to often forgotten theater history and some of what she said concerns American history many of us know about. So I hope as I tell you about Caterina to make these references clear. (Slight pause)
Despite being a classically trained singer, an opera singer, Caterina worked on Broadway. She was in the original 1921 Broadway production of Shuffle Along. It was the first Broadway show ever written and produced by African-Americans.
Many theater professionals were skeptical a black-written show would appeal to Broadway audiences. But it ran for 504 performances and earned $9 million, a long run and a large sum for its time.
The book writers were names you’ve probably never heard, Flournoy Miller and Aubrey Lyles. The best known song in Shuffle Along was I’m Just Wild about Harry. The writers of all the songs in the show were Noble Sissle and Eubie Blake. [2]
Of those four writers— Miller, Lyles, Sissle and Blake— Blake gained the most notoriety. Besides I’m Just Wild about Harry the songs In Honeysuckle Time and Memories of You were among his hits. In 1981 he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Ronald Reagan.
Back to Caterina— now that I’ve mentioned her Broadway work I’ll move on to opera. She made her United States opera debut in Verdi’s Aida in a 1933 Summer Opera series at the Hippodrome, a very large New York City Theater. It was the first time a black woman had the lead role in an all-white opera company in America.
Both before and after that appearance she toured for a number of seasons in Europe. Needless to say she returned to the States as WWII started. After returning she had recitals at Town Hall and Carnegie Hall.
Caterina once told me this story: upon her return to America in 1941 she approached an agent to see if she could get a tour started stateside. Of course, the well known African-American classical singer in that era was Marian Anderson.
In 1939 the Daughters of the American Revolution refused to allow Anderson to sing in Constitution Hall for an integrated audience. So Eleanor and Franklin Roosevelt arranged for Anderson to perform on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. A crowd of 75,000 gathered for that and there was a radio audience of millions.
Caterina was told by that agent she approached there was room for only one black female classical singer in America and currently that singer was Marion Anderson. So no, there would be no room for Caterina Jarboro or a Caterina Jarboro tour. One black classical singer in America was enough, thank you. (Slight pause.)
Caterina taught me a lot by her attitude, by how she approached her volunteer work at the Actors Fund. She was precise. She was dedicated. She was faithful. And her story, her many stories, spoke volumes to me.
And yes, she was extraordinarily talented. And yes, because of the world in which she lived, the era in which she lived, she was never able receive the acclaim she deserved. That must have been excruciatingly hard to deal with, hard to comprehend.
But she persisted. In a way she was relentless. She never surrendered, never gave up. She always moved forward with a steady, sure hand.
Because the world is what it is she knew there would be roadblocks. But she also knew there was work to be done. And she was someone who could be trusted, someone who could be counted on to do what she could. (Long pause.)
These words are in Genesis: “On that day Yahweh, God, made a covenant with Abram...” (Slight pause.)
I want you to notice several things about this reading. Abram gathers a heifer, a goat, a ram, a turtledove and a young pigeon. Abram even cuts the larger animals in two.
The darkness, the smoking barrier, the fire pot, the flaming torch we hear about are images fraught with the symbolism of covenant making in the Ancient Near East. Hence, they are not meant as mysterious. That these are symbols of covenant making would have been clear to those who first read these words.
Now, when God says words that give the land (quote:) “to your descendants,” therefore when the covenant, itself, is established, when God enacts the covenant, itself, Abram is (quote:) “in a deep trance.” Therefore Abram does nothing to establish the covenant, enact the covenant or respond to the covenant.
So there is no question about this. The covenant made by God with us is not a two way agreement. It is God Who makes the covenant with us.
The covenant God offers is, like grace, a free gift. God initiates this covenant. God enacts this covenant. God establishes the covenant. To use a phrase I used last week, God is the prime mover. The covenant is not of our doing
Further, what Abram has done is not covenant making. Abram participates. Abram participates by gathering and slaughtering the animals. So what has Abram really done? Abram trusted God.
So you might ask, if Abram has done nothing to initiate the covenant, to enact the covenant, to establish the covenant, where is our place in this covenant? What are we to do? I think the key is simple and sometimes hard deal with, hard to comprehend because we firmly believe we are in control of everything.
That having been said, let me ask a key question yet again, where is our place in this covenant? (Slight pause.) We are invited by God to participate— participate— in the covenant. And for us mere participation can be hard. It does not feel like enough. We want to do more. Perhaps we even want be in control. (Slight pause.)
I want to suggest there is something for us to do, something we can do. But it has nothing to do with control. It is about relinquishing control. We are to do what Abram did. We are called to trust God. (Slight pause.)
Let’s go back to the story of Caterina Jarboro. She was in Shuffle Along, the first Broadway show ever written and produced by African-Americans. She toured for a number of seasons in Europe.
She was the first black woman to have the lead role in an all-white opera company in America. But she was not able to receive the acclaim she deserved since there was room for only one Marian Anderson in America. And yes, that must have been hard to deal with, hard to comprehend.
And what was she doing when I met her? She was volunteering for The Actors Fund. In volunteering she was raising money to help those in her profession in need.
What was she really doing when I met her? She was persisting. She was being relentless. She had never surrendered, never given up.
She was always moving forward with a sure, steady hand. She knew there was more to life than roadblocks. She trusted that. (Slight pause.)
So, why was I reminded of Caterina twice in one week? Perhaps I was reminded so I could share her story. And perhaps I was reminded so I could note that our real part in the covenant is to trust God. And that, I think, not just our part in covenant. That is the real lesson of covenant: trust God.
Why? The world is what it is. Caterina knew that. The world now is not the way God would have it. Caterina knew that.
And we need to trust God so we can be empowered to do the work of God and the will of God. Doing the work of God and the will of God is the result of trusting God. Amen.
ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “Theologian Walter Brueggemann said this (quote:) ‘Covenant (and, therefore, true spirituality), consists of learning the skills and sensitivities that include both the courage to assert self and the grace to abandon self to another’ (unquote). In short, covenant is not possible unless you recognize the needs of others.’ The needs of others— it’s that love your neighbor thing we keep hearing about. And I would suggest to love your neighbor we actually need to trust God.”
BENEDICTION: Let our hearts take courage. Our God meets us where our needs rest. God is our shelter and shield. God’s blessings outnumber the stars. Let us go on our way with Christ as our companion. And may the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/1986/08/16/obituaries/caterina-jarboro.html
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuffle_Along
Covenant Made
“On that day Yahweh, God, made a covenant with Abram...” — Genesis 15:18.
It happens all the time. People enter our lives. Then we move on or they move on and in a sense we forget them. But do we?
I was recently reminded twice in one week of someone who was in my life 40 years ago. And I was reminded of this person because of conversations I had with two friends at two different times. Things they said brought this person to mind.
Why did that happen? I don’t know. But when, for whatever reason, something like that does happen my sense is I’m supposed to pay attention.
This person’s name was Caterina Jarboro. She was an African-American classical singer. She died in 1986 at the age of 90.
I looked up her obituary in the New York Times to see if the facts stated there jibed with my memory. [1] Generally they did. But I have more detail from the stories she told me then the Times offered, so let me share some recollections.
I met Caterina when I was working with the Actor’s Fund of America. She was a volunteer. Some of what she told me refers to often forgotten theater history and some of what she said concerns American history many of us know about. So I hope as I tell you about Caterina to make these references clear. (Slight pause)
Despite being a classically trained singer, an opera singer, Caterina worked on Broadway. She was in the original 1921 Broadway production of Shuffle Along. It was the first Broadway show ever written and produced by African-Americans.
Many theater professionals were skeptical a black-written show would appeal to Broadway audiences. But it ran for 504 performances and earned $9 million, a long run and a large sum for its time.
The book writers were names you’ve probably never heard, Flournoy Miller and Aubrey Lyles. The best known song in Shuffle Along was I’m Just Wild about Harry. The writers of all the songs in the show were Noble Sissle and Eubie Blake. [2]
Of those four writers— Miller, Lyles, Sissle and Blake— Blake gained the most notoriety. Besides I’m Just Wild about Harry the songs In Honeysuckle Time and Memories of You were among his hits. In 1981 he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Ronald Reagan.
Back to Caterina— now that I’ve mentioned her Broadway work I’ll move on to opera. She made her United States opera debut in Verdi’s Aida in a 1933 Summer Opera series at the Hippodrome, a very large New York City Theater. It was the first time a black woman had the lead role in an all-white opera company in America.
Both before and after that appearance she toured for a number of seasons in Europe. Needless to say she returned to the States as WWII started. After returning she had recitals at Town Hall and Carnegie Hall.
Caterina once told me this story: upon her return to America in 1941 she approached an agent to see if she could get a tour started stateside. Of course, the well known African-American classical singer in that era was Marian Anderson.
In 1939 the Daughters of the American Revolution refused to allow Anderson to sing in Constitution Hall for an integrated audience. So Eleanor and Franklin Roosevelt arranged for Anderson to perform on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. A crowd of 75,000 gathered for that and there was a radio audience of millions.
Caterina was told by that agent she approached there was room for only one black female classical singer in America and currently that singer was Marion Anderson. So no, there would be no room for Caterina Jarboro or a Caterina Jarboro tour. One black classical singer in America was enough, thank you. (Slight pause.)
Caterina taught me a lot by her attitude, by how she approached her volunteer work at the Actors Fund. She was precise. She was dedicated. She was faithful. And her story, her many stories, spoke volumes to me.
And yes, she was extraordinarily talented. And yes, because of the world in which she lived, the era in which she lived, she was never able receive the acclaim she deserved. That must have been excruciatingly hard to deal with, hard to comprehend.
But she persisted. In a way she was relentless. She never surrendered, never gave up. She always moved forward with a steady, sure hand.
Because the world is what it is she knew there would be roadblocks. But she also knew there was work to be done. And she was someone who could be trusted, someone who could be counted on to do what she could. (Long pause.)
These words are in Genesis: “On that day Yahweh, God, made a covenant with Abram...” (Slight pause.)
I want you to notice several things about this reading. Abram gathers a heifer, a goat, a ram, a turtledove and a young pigeon. Abram even cuts the larger animals in two.
The darkness, the smoking barrier, the fire pot, the flaming torch we hear about are images fraught with the symbolism of covenant making in the Ancient Near East. Hence, they are not meant as mysterious. That these are symbols of covenant making would have been clear to those who first read these words.
Now, when God says words that give the land (quote:) “to your descendants,” therefore when the covenant, itself, is established, when God enacts the covenant, itself, Abram is (quote:) “in a deep trance.” Therefore Abram does nothing to establish the covenant, enact the covenant or respond to the covenant.
So there is no question about this. The covenant made by God with us is not a two way agreement. It is God Who makes the covenant with us.
The covenant God offers is, like grace, a free gift. God initiates this covenant. God enacts this covenant. God establishes the covenant. To use a phrase I used last week, God is the prime mover. The covenant is not of our doing
Further, what Abram has done is not covenant making. Abram participates. Abram participates by gathering and slaughtering the animals. So what has Abram really done? Abram trusted God.
So you might ask, if Abram has done nothing to initiate the covenant, to enact the covenant, to establish the covenant, where is our place in this covenant? What are we to do? I think the key is simple and sometimes hard deal with, hard to comprehend because we firmly believe we are in control of everything.
That having been said, let me ask a key question yet again, where is our place in this covenant? (Slight pause.) We are invited by God to participate— participate— in the covenant. And for us mere participation can be hard. It does not feel like enough. We want to do more. Perhaps we even want be in control. (Slight pause.)
I want to suggest there is something for us to do, something we can do. But it has nothing to do with control. It is about relinquishing control. We are to do what Abram did. We are called to trust God. (Slight pause.)
Let’s go back to the story of Caterina Jarboro. She was in Shuffle Along, the first Broadway show ever written and produced by African-Americans. She toured for a number of seasons in Europe.
She was the first black woman to have the lead role in an all-white opera company in America. But she was not able to receive the acclaim she deserved since there was room for only one Marian Anderson in America. And yes, that must have been hard to deal with, hard to comprehend.
And what was she doing when I met her? She was volunteering for The Actors Fund. In volunteering she was raising money to help those in her profession in need.
What was she really doing when I met her? She was persisting. She was being relentless. She had never surrendered, never given up.
She was always moving forward with a sure, steady hand. She knew there was more to life than roadblocks. She trusted that. (Slight pause.)
So, why was I reminded of Caterina twice in one week? Perhaps I was reminded so I could share her story. And perhaps I was reminded so I could note that our real part in the covenant is to trust God. And that, I think, not just our part in covenant. That is the real lesson of covenant: trust God.
Why? The world is what it is. Caterina knew that. The world now is not the way God would have it. Caterina knew that.
And we need to trust God so we can be empowered to do the work of God and the will of God. Doing the work of God and the will of God is the result of trusting God. Amen.
ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “Theologian Walter Brueggemann said this (quote:) ‘Covenant (and, therefore, true spirituality), consists of learning the skills and sensitivities that include both the courage to assert self and the grace to abandon self to another’ (unquote). In short, covenant is not possible unless you recognize the needs of others.’ The needs of others— it’s that love your neighbor thing we keep hearing about. And I would suggest to love your neighbor we actually need to trust God.”
BENEDICTION: Let our hearts take courage. Our God meets us where our needs rest. God is our shelter and shield. God’s blessings outnumber the stars. Let us go on our way with Christ as our companion. And may the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/1986/08/16/obituaries/caterina-jarboro.html
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuffle_Along
Sunday, March 10, 2019
SERMON ~ 03/10/2019 ~ First Sunday in Lent ~ “Near Occasions”
READINGS: 03/10/2019 ~ First Sunday in Lent ~ Deuteronomy 26:1-11; Psalm 91:1-2, 9-16; Romans 10:8b-13; Luke 4:1-13 ~ Service at Chenango Valley Home.
Near Occasions
“In reply Jesus said, ‘It also says, ‘Do not put God to the test.’” — Luke 4:12
Sometimes you meet someone and you connect with that person immediately and you cannot ever quite understand why you have made that connection. On the other hand and on other occasions you can connect with someone and right away you fully understand that connection.
Back when I lived in New York City and was active in professional theater I made a connection, became a friend with someone, and it was easy to understand why we made an immediate connection. But the real reason we connected was not the obvious one. The obvious connection was theater— she was a dancer and actor, I was a writer. But there were also great differences between us and those differences were quite large.
I was, for instance, from New York City. She was from Omaha, Nebraska. Those are worlds apart.
Interestingly, the real connection was our schools and our schooling. We had both gone to a parochial grade school, a Catholic school, one of us in Omaha, one of us in New York City.
But it was not just that we had both attended a Catholic school. Both schools were staffed by the same order of teaching nuns— Dominicans, the order of Saint Dominic. This is an order well known for its outstanding teachers.
In claiming that having Dominican nuns as teachers was the significant connection, let me illustrate that with just one story and I think you’ll see what I mean. In instructing their charges about religion we both heard exactly the same thing concerning sin.
This is what was said: the responsibility of any individual was to try to avoid being a sinner. And how did one avoid being a sinner?
The individual had to keep away from what the nuns called the “near occasions of sin.” Here’s an example and it the one they used. In both Omaha and New York City might add they used the same example! If gambling on horses is a sin— and believe me, the nuns very much thought gambling on horses was a sin— if gambling on horses is a sin then one must never go to a racetrack.
After all, just being at a racetrack puts you physically in a place where the sin of gambling on horses was quite close. And when you are that close to gambling you might be tempted to gamble. A racetrack was, hence, a near occasion of sin. So stay away from racetracks since when you are at one sin sits there waiting to take possession of you.
These nuns had, I think, never spoken to my late grandfather. My grandfather had, himself, never actually been to a racetrack even though he lied about five miles from one. But, illegal though this practice was, he had his own personal bookie, a bookmaker, and he placed bets on the nags regularly.
My point is twofold. One reason my friend and I connected quickly is we had, essentially, the same grade school training, the same grade school experience, despite the fact that the locations where we spent our youth were half a continent away.
My second point has to do with today’s Gospel reading. You probably noticed in this reading Jesus encounters a bunch of near occasions of sin. So, is this reading about overcoming the near occasions of sin or is it about something else? (Slight pause.)
We hear this in the work commonly called Luke: “In reply Jesus said, ‘It also says, ‘Do not put God to the test.’” (Slight pause.)
Perhaps a good place to start in thinking about this is by asking the obvious question: what is the Biblical definition of sin? The Biblical definition of sin is simple and straightforward.
Sin is breaking covenant. Therefore and hence, sin is anything imperfect. The last time I looked none of us are perfect. (If anyone here is perfect you can leave now.) So, in that sense we are all sinners.
But I want to suggest this reading is not about us nor is it about our transgressions, our sins, whatever they might be. This reading is about God. Therefore, a basic statement needs to be made.
We are not the ones who seek to be in covenant with God. God reaches out to us and seeks to be covenant with us. God is, to use the classic language, the prime mover.
Here’s a different way of saying that. God loves us. God loves us unconditionally no matter where we are at, even no matter what we do.
Therefore, the next obvious question becomes what should we do in response to the fact that God loves us? Indeed, given this is the season known as Lent, some people suggest we should give up something.
It is sometimes suggested we abstain from things. By the way, not fact from things; abstain from things. There’s a difference. Fact is like not eating for a long, long time. Abstain is not doing. O.K.? It’s suggested we should abstain from things, not have them.
Say, for instance, abstain from chocolate or ice cream. I think a lot of people are shaking their heads ‘no’ on that one, right? O.K. So, what we should do? Should we abstain?
I have a list of things from which we might abstain, that has been going around recently. It’s a couple of years old and it is attributed to Pope Francis.
Here it is: abstain from hurting words, words that hurt; say kind words. Abstain from sadness; be filled with gratitude. Abstain from anger; be filled with patience. Abstain from pessimism; be filled with hope. Abstain from worries; trust God.
Abstain from complaints; contemplate simplicity. Abstain from pressures; be prayerful. Abstain from bitterness; be joyful. Abstain from selfishness; be compassionate. Abstain from grudges; be reconciled; abstain from words; be silent, listen. (Slight pause.)
Did you notice this is actually a list of positives, things we can and should do rather than things we should not do, things from which we might really abstain like ice cream and chocolate. I am quite sure each of you could add something else to this list, something you could do.
For me, doing is central in keeping covenant with God. We need to search and find out what can we do to make things better. What can we do to make things better?
We need to find solutions rather than complain about problems. We need to discover what can we do to work toward the fulness of a covenant with God.
And that brings me back to what covenant is about. As I said earlier, “God loves us unconditionally no matter where we are at, even no matter what we do.” (Slight pause.)
On Wednesday last, Ash Wednesday, people and pastors from my church, the United Church of Christ, First Congregational, from Broad Street United Methodist Church, from Christ Evangelical Lutheran Church, from Emmanuel Episcopal Church and from the First Baptist Church— five churches— gathered together for an Ash Wednesday Service. Five churches we gathered as one in Christ. Now right there— that’s doing something.
Ashes were imposed. Ashes are not meant to be a symbol of the wrath of God or sorrow, though I am sure some take it that way. Rather ashes are a symbol of our mortality, our frailty, our imperfection.
Hence, they are also a symbol which says we need to do the work of God here, now in our time— doing! The work of God is about doing. The work of God is about the aforementioned kind words, gratitude, patience, hope, trust, simplicity, prayerfulness, joy, compassion, reconciliation, listening.
So perhaps what we need to ask during this season we call Lent is what can we do? Here’s my suggestion. We can strive to be in covenant with God.
The way I see it, being in covenant with God is at one and the same time amazingly easy and dreadfully hard. Being in covenant with God means loving God and loving our neighbor. Covenant— that is very easy to say. Covenant— that is dreadfully hard to do.
And yes, we will never be perfect at the work of covenant. Who is? Perfection is not the point.
Doing the work of God is the point. And if Lent is about anything that’s what it is about: striving to do the work and the will of God, striving to love God and love one another. Amen.
03/10/2019
Chenango Valley Home, Norwich, New York
ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “I earlier mentioned five churches gathered on Ash Wednesday for a Union Service. In the sermon my colleague the Rev. Dr. David Spiegel said this about our imperfection, our sin, and the response of God. ‘We cannot out-sin God, cannot sin in any amount which exceeds God’s capacity to forgive us, God’s fervor in embracing us, God’s willingness to love us.’ How about that? Our imperfection includes our ability to sin. We are not even perfect at that!”
BENEDICTION: God heals and restores. God grants to us the grace and the talent to witness to the love God has for us. Let us be ready as we go into the world, for we are baptized in the power of the Spirit. And may the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.
Near Occasions
“In reply Jesus said, ‘It also says, ‘Do not put God to the test.’” — Luke 4:12
Sometimes you meet someone and you connect with that person immediately and you cannot ever quite understand why you have made that connection. On the other hand and on other occasions you can connect with someone and right away you fully understand that connection.
Back when I lived in New York City and was active in professional theater I made a connection, became a friend with someone, and it was easy to understand why we made an immediate connection. But the real reason we connected was not the obvious one. The obvious connection was theater— she was a dancer and actor, I was a writer. But there were also great differences between us and those differences were quite large.
I was, for instance, from New York City. She was from Omaha, Nebraska. Those are worlds apart.
Interestingly, the real connection was our schools and our schooling. We had both gone to a parochial grade school, a Catholic school, one of us in Omaha, one of us in New York City.
But it was not just that we had both attended a Catholic school. Both schools were staffed by the same order of teaching nuns— Dominicans, the order of Saint Dominic. This is an order well known for its outstanding teachers.
In claiming that having Dominican nuns as teachers was the significant connection, let me illustrate that with just one story and I think you’ll see what I mean. In instructing their charges about religion we both heard exactly the same thing concerning sin.
This is what was said: the responsibility of any individual was to try to avoid being a sinner. And how did one avoid being a sinner?
The individual had to keep away from what the nuns called the “near occasions of sin.” Here’s an example and it the one they used. In both Omaha and New York City might add they used the same example! If gambling on horses is a sin— and believe me, the nuns very much thought gambling on horses was a sin— if gambling on horses is a sin then one must never go to a racetrack.
After all, just being at a racetrack puts you physically in a place where the sin of gambling on horses was quite close. And when you are that close to gambling you might be tempted to gamble. A racetrack was, hence, a near occasion of sin. So stay away from racetracks since when you are at one sin sits there waiting to take possession of you.
These nuns had, I think, never spoken to my late grandfather. My grandfather had, himself, never actually been to a racetrack even though he lied about five miles from one. But, illegal though this practice was, he had his own personal bookie, a bookmaker, and he placed bets on the nags regularly.
My point is twofold. One reason my friend and I connected quickly is we had, essentially, the same grade school training, the same grade school experience, despite the fact that the locations where we spent our youth were half a continent away.
My second point has to do with today’s Gospel reading. You probably noticed in this reading Jesus encounters a bunch of near occasions of sin. So, is this reading about overcoming the near occasions of sin or is it about something else? (Slight pause.)
We hear this in the work commonly called Luke: “In reply Jesus said, ‘It also says, ‘Do not put God to the test.’” (Slight pause.)
Perhaps a good place to start in thinking about this is by asking the obvious question: what is the Biblical definition of sin? The Biblical definition of sin is simple and straightforward.
Sin is breaking covenant. Therefore and hence, sin is anything imperfect. The last time I looked none of us are perfect. (If anyone here is perfect you can leave now.) So, in that sense we are all sinners.
But I want to suggest this reading is not about us nor is it about our transgressions, our sins, whatever they might be. This reading is about God. Therefore, a basic statement needs to be made.
We are not the ones who seek to be in covenant with God. God reaches out to us and seeks to be covenant with us. God is, to use the classic language, the prime mover.
Here’s a different way of saying that. God loves us. God loves us unconditionally no matter where we are at, even no matter what we do.
Therefore, the next obvious question becomes what should we do in response to the fact that God loves us? Indeed, given this is the season known as Lent, some people suggest we should give up something.
It is sometimes suggested we abstain from things. By the way, not fact from things; abstain from things. There’s a difference. Fact is like not eating for a long, long time. Abstain is not doing. O.K.? It’s suggested we should abstain from things, not have them.
Say, for instance, abstain from chocolate or ice cream. I think a lot of people are shaking their heads ‘no’ on that one, right? O.K. So, what we should do? Should we abstain?
I have a list of things from which we might abstain, that has been going around recently. It’s a couple of years old and it is attributed to Pope Francis.
Here it is: abstain from hurting words, words that hurt; say kind words. Abstain from sadness; be filled with gratitude. Abstain from anger; be filled with patience. Abstain from pessimism; be filled with hope. Abstain from worries; trust God.
Abstain from complaints; contemplate simplicity. Abstain from pressures; be prayerful. Abstain from bitterness; be joyful. Abstain from selfishness; be compassionate. Abstain from grudges; be reconciled; abstain from words; be silent, listen. (Slight pause.)
Did you notice this is actually a list of positives, things we can and should do rather than things we should not do, things from which we might really abstain like ice cream and chocolate. I am quite sure each of you could add something else to this list, something you could do.
For me, doing is central in keeping covenant with God. We need to search and find out what can we do to make things better. What can we do to make things better?
We need to find solutions rather than complain about problems. We need to discover what can we do to work toward the fulness of a covenant with God.
And that brings me back to what covenant is about. As I said earlier, “God loves us unconditionally no matter where we are at, even no matter what we do.” (Slight pause.)
On Wednesday last, Ash Wednesday, people and pastors from my church, the United Church of Christ, First Congregational, from Broad Street United Methodist Church, from Christ Evangelical Lutheran Church, from Emmanuel Episcopal Church and from the First Baptist Church— five churches— gathered together for an Ash Wednesday Service. Five churches we gathered as one in Christ. Now right there— that’s doing something.
Ashes were imposed. Ashes are not meant to be a symbol of the wrath of God or sorrow, though I am sure some take it that way. Rather ashes are a symbol of our mortality, our frailty, our imperfection.
Hence, they are also a symbol which says we need to do the work of God here, now in our time— doing! The work of God is about doing. The work of God is about the aforementioned kind words, gratitude, patience, hope, trust, simplicity, prayerfulness, joy, compassion, reconciliation, listening.
So perhaps what we need to ask during this season we call Lent is what can we do? Here’s my suggestion. We can strive to be in covenant with God.
The way I see it, being in covenant with God is at one and the same time amazingly easy and dreadfully hard. Being in covenant with God means loving God and loving our neighbor. Covenant— that is very easy to say. Covenant— that is dreadfully hard to do.
And yes, we will never be perfect at the work of covenant. Who is? Perfection is not the point.
Doing the work of God is the point. And if Lent is about anything that’s what it is about: striving to do the work and the will of God, striving to love God and love one another. Amen.
03/10/2019
Chenango Valley Home, Norwich, New York
ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “I earlier mentioned five churches gathered on Ash Wednesday for a Union Service. In the sermon my colleague the Rev. Dr. David Spiegel said this about our imperfection, our sin, and the response of God. ‘We cannot out-sin God, cannot sin in any amount which exceeds God’s capacity to forgive us, God’s fervor in embracing us, God’s willingness to love us.’ How about that? Our imperfection includes our ability to sin. We are not even perfect at that!”
BENEDICTION: God heals and restores. God grants to us the grace and the talent to witness to the love God has for us. Let us be ready as we go into the world, for we are baptized in the power of the Spirit. And may the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.
Sunday, March 3, 2019
SERMON ~ 03/03/2019 ~ “Transfiguration and Reality”
03/03/2019 ~ Transfiguration Sunday ~ Known in Some Traditions as the Last Sunday Before the Season of Lent ~ Known in Some Traditions as the Fifth Sunday in Ordinary Time ~ Communion Sunday ~ Exodus 34:29-35; Psalm 99; 2 Corinthians 3:12-4:2; Luke 9:28-36, (37-43a).
Transfiguration and Reality
“Therefore, because we have this ministry through God’s mercy, we do not give into discouragement, we do not lose heart.” — 2 Corinthians 4:1.
I have often referenced my theater work in my Sunday comments. When I do so most of the time the relationship I draw is to the work of being a writer. This characterization is true.
However, to paint my theater work in a way which is that narrow also short changes what I did. This is a list not of all but of some of what I did.
I was a stage manager for an Off-off Broadway production. I had a hand in designing lighting and sets, even helped build some of those sets.
I directed— both plays and club acts, booked musicians for gigs, coached singers and actors. I was an advisor at the High School of Performing Arts.
I was the business manager of a Children’s Theater. Let me translate that one: I kept track of finances, yes. But drew up schedules— made sure people were where they were supposed to be for performances— wrote grants, one of which was a National Endowment for the Arts which grant we got, grants through which the operation survived.
Last on this brief list, I was an executive with The Actors Fund of America. This is a charitable organization which supports performers and behind-the-scenes workers in arts and entertainment— film, theater, television, music, etc.
The Fund offers social services from financial assistance to employment training. It operates the Actors Home, a nursing and assisted living facility. (Slight pause.)
Now, when I worked for the Fund I was one of two people who went through the estate of Basil Rathbone. Those of you over 50 will know exactly who Basil Rathbone is. Those of you under fifty will probably have to Google him.
Suffice it to say Rathbone, a British character actor, played both heros and villains— Sherlock Holmes and Pontius Pilate to name one of each— and in the 1940s was one of the highest paid Hollywood actors. After Rathbone and his wife died their lawyers rummaged through the estate, got what they thought was of value and handed the rest over to the Fund.
To them what was left looked like— and I’ll use the Yiddish word here— dreck— what was left looked like dreck, rubbish, trash. It was not dreck.
And I plowed through all this stuff. Now, at that point I already had a reputation for evaluating theatrical memorabilia— memorabilia— items of historical interest associated with memorable people.
Right now I don’t and you don’t have time for me to try explain why I had that reputation. Please take it for what it’s worth.
But this is an example of the difference between something of worth and dreck. Rathbone’s first Actors Equity contract, the first time he appeared on Broadway— valuable— no doubt about it. An 8x10 glossy picture of a place setting from a dinner party the Rathbones threw in Hollywood— not so much in terms of value.
Now, when you do something like this— go through what someone has left behind— you need to be ruthless about what is of value and what is not. The picture— dreck; the contract— not dreck, And then you throw the dreck— that picture— out, get rid of it. (Slight pause.)
As of today, I will be the pastor in this place for another 120 days. Let me be blunt: after 23 plus years I am having separation anxiety. To combat that I have just stared to separate some the dreck from non dreck in my office. I’ve not gotten too far but I’ve started.
I came across this. (The pastor holds up what looks like a rolled up newspaper wrapped in rubber bands.) If it looks like newspaper wrapped in rubber hands, that’s what it is. I used this in a Children’s Time not long after I got here.
Why did I save it? This harkens back to my own childhood. When I was perhaps in the first or second grade my friends and I would play what we called baseball in front of the house on the streets of Brooklyn with this.
We were young. So we had little bats and this was what our so-called ball looked like. It would not break any windows, especially care windows. It would not hurt any of us if we were hit by it.
I don’t remember what I said at that Children’s Time. But I have kept this on my desk for 20 plus years.
Why? Probably because it’s about my childhood. But let’s face it. It’s dreck— rubbish, trash, even if I am emotionally attached to it. (Slight pause.)
We hear this in 2 Corinthians: “Therefore, because we have this ministry through God’s mercy, we do not give into discouragement, we do not lose heart.” (Slight pause.)
Every commentary I’ve seen says one thing about this passage. It is very complex. Hence, figuring out what Paul is trying to do here is not easy. But I want to make a suggestion. Paul is encouraging us to go back to essentials— get rid of the dreck, the trash, the rubbish.
You see, I found it fascinating, instructive and informative that this reading is the assigned lection from the Epistles today. Why?
As you heard earlier, today is called Transfiguration Sunday. In each year of the three year lectionary cycle one of the Transfiguration stories is read from one of the Gospels on this Last Sunday Before Lent.
And what is the Transfiguration? Here’s a $64 word, one you also heard earlier. The Transfiguration is a theophany, an experience of the real presence of God.
Which brings us back to Paul. The apostle clearly brings up the Torah, the teachings, Moses, then says this (quote:) “And we... reflect the glory of our God (and) grow brighter and brighter as we are being transformed into the same image we reflect. This is the work of our God, who is Spirit.”
Any Jew in New Testament times would recognize what Paul says here. (Quote:) “the glory of our God”— glory— in Hebrew Kabod— which means the real presence of God. And what is the Transfiguration? It is an experience of the real presence of God.
And that is, I think, why Paul insists ministry is present through God’s mercy and we should not give into discouragement, we should not lose heart. God is present. God walks with us.
That is the reality we Christians claim, the claim of the Transfiguration, the claim of the Resurrection. God is present. God walks with us. (Slight pause.)
To reiterate and be to be blunt: after 23 plus years here I have separation anxiety. To combat that I have just stared to separate some dreck from non dreck in my office.
And this week I came across some memorabilia. (The pastor holds up what looks like a rolled up newspaper wrapped in rubber bands.) But this is dreck. (The pastor drops this object to the floor of the nave.)
Why do I say that? It may tie me emotionally to the past. But should that be my focus? And what should be my focus? (Slight pause.)
For these 23 plus years I have done my best as I tried to focus not on the idea that God is present to me, walks with me. I have tied to focus on the idea that God is present to us— all of us. God walks with us— all of us.
And yes, at times I have been discouraged. At times Paul had to have been discouraged also or the Apostle to the Gentiles would have never written (quote:) “we do not give into discouragement, we do not lose heart.”
And we, you and I, should not be discouraged. We, you and I, should not lose heart. Why?
(Quote:) “We have this ministry through God’s mercy, we do not give into discouragement, we do not lose heart.” And that, my friends, is not dreck.
Ministry here, in this place, at this time, is granted to us by God and God is with us. God does walk with us. Amen.
03/03/2019
United Church of Christ, First Congregational, Norwich, New York
ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “I am going to say something about my process in preaching. That’s different. Often I don’t say anything about that. I usually work a month or two ahead in planning sermons. I decide on which reading I will preach, I formulate a sermon title and I make notes to myself as to where I think I might go with a sermon. And then I sit down with Mary Williams and shs pushes me. ‘What do you mean by that?’she says. And she helps me think it through. In any case, the note I made over a month ago said: ‘We need to daily realize Christ is with us as we do the work and the will of God. This is a message of the Transfiguration and Paul understood hope is central because of the reality of the Christ. The Transfiguration story— it really is just a story— but it is meant to help us and give language with which we can express a foretaste of the reality of the Risen Christ.’”
BENEDICTION: God heals and restores. God grants to us the grace and the talent to witness to the love God has for us. So let us live in the light God offers. And, therefore, let us be ready as we go into the world, for we are baptized in the power of the Spirit. And may the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.
Transfiguration and Reality
“Therefore, because we have this ministry through God’s mercy, we do not give into discouragement, we do not lose heart.” — 2 Corinthians 4:1.
I have often referenced my theater work in my Sunday comments. When I do so most of the time the relationship I draw is to the work of being a writer. This characterization is true.
However, to paint my theater work in a way which is that narrow also short changes what I did. This is a list not of all but of some of what I did.
I was a stage manager for an Off-off Broadway production. I had a hand in designing lighting and sets, even helped build some of those sets.
I directed— both plays and club acts, booked musicians for gigs, coached singers and actors. I was an advisor at the High School of Performing Arts.
I was the business manager of a Children’s Theater. Let me translate that one: I kept track of finances, yes. But drew up schedules— made sure people were where they were supposed to be for performances— wrote grants, one of which was a National Endowment for the Arts which grant we got, grants through which the operation survived.
Last on this brief list, I was an executive with The Actors Fund of America. This is a charitable organization which supports performers and behind-the-scenes workers in arts and entertainment— film, theater, television, music, etc.
The Fund offers social services from financial assistance to employment training. It operates the Actors Home, a nursing and assisted living facility. (Slight pause.)
Now, when I worked for the Fund I was one of two people who went through the estate of Basil Rathbone. Those of you over 50 will know exactly who Basil Rathbone is. Those of you under fifty will probably have to Google him.
Suffice it to say Rathbone, a British character actor, played both heros and villains— Sherlock Holmes and Pontius Pilate to name one of each— and in the 1940s was one of the highest paid Hollywood actors. After Rathbone and his wife died their lawyers rummaged through the estate, got what they thought was of value and handed the rest over to the Fund.
To them what was left looked like— and I’ll use the Yiddish word here— dreck— what was left looked like dreck, rubbish, trash. It was not dreck.
And I plowed through all this stuff. Now, at that point I already had a reputation for evaluating theatrical memorabilia— memorabilia— items of historical interest associated with memorable people.
Right now I don’t and you don’t have time for me to try explain why I had that reputation. Please take it for what it’s worth.
But this is an example of the difference between something of worth and dreck. Rathbone’s first Actors Equity contract, the first time he appeared on Broadway— valuable— no doubt about it. An 8x10 glossy picture of a place setting from a dinner party the Rathbones threw in Hollywood— not so much in terms of value.
Now, when you do something like this— go through what someone has left behind— you need to be ruthless about what is of value and what is not. The picture— dreck; the contract— not dreck, And then you throw the dreck— that picture— out, get rid of it. (Slight pause.)
As of today, I will be the pastor in this place for another 120 days. Let me be blunt: after 23 plus years I am having separation anxiety. To combat that I have just stared to separate some the dreck from non dreck in my office. I’ve not gotten too far but I’ve started.
I came across this. (The pastor holds up what looks like a rolled up newspaper wrapped in rubber bands.) If it looks like newspaper wrapped in rubber hands, that’s what it is. I used this in a Children’s Time not long after I got here.
Why did I save it? This harkens back to my own childhood. When I was perhaps in the first or second grade my friends and I would play what we called baseball in front of the house on the streets of Brooklyn with this.
We were young. So we had little bats and this was what our so-called ball looked like. It would not break any windows, especially care windows. It would not hurt any of us if we were hit by it.
I don’t remember what I said at that Children’s Time. But I have kept this on my desk for 20 plus years.
Why? Probably because it’s about my childhood. But let’s face it. It’s dreck— rubbish, trash, even if I am emotionally attached to it. (Slight pause.)
We hear this in 2 Corinthians: “Therefore, because we have this ministry through God’s mercy, we do not give into discouragement, we do not lose heart.” (Slight pause.)
Every commentary I’ve seen says one thing about this passage. It is very complex. Hence, figuring out what Paul is trying to do here is not easy. But I want to make a suggestion. Paul is encouraging us to go back to essentials— get rid of the dreck, the trash, the rubbish.
You see, I found it fascinating, instructive and informative that this reading is the assigned lection from the Epistles today. Why?
As you heard earlier, today is called Transfiguration Sunday. In each year of the three year lectionary cycle one of the Transfiguration stories is read from one of the Gospels on this Last Sunday Before Lent.
And what is the Transfiguration? Here’s a $64 word, one you also heard earlier. The Transfiguration is a theophany, an experience of the real presence of God.
Which brings us back to Paul. The apostle clearly brings up the Torah, the teachings, Moses, then says this (quote:) “And we... reflect the glory of our God (and) grow brighter and brighter as we are being transformed into the same image we reflect. This is the work of our God, who is Spirit.”
Any Jew in New Testament times would recognize what Paul says here. (Quote:) “the glory of our God”— glory— in Hebrew Kabod— which means the real presence of God. And what is the Transfiguration? It is an experience of the real presence of God.
And that is, I think, why Paul insists ministry is present through God’s mercy and we should not give into discouragement, we should not lose heart. God is present. God walks with us.
That is the reality we Christians claim, the claim of the Transfiguration, the claim of the Resurrection. God is present. God walks with us. (Slight pause.)
To reiterate and be to be blunt: after 23 plus years here I have separation anxiety. To combat that I have just stared to separate some dreck from non dreck in my office.
And this week I came across some memorabilia. (The pastor holds up what looks like a rolled up newspaper wrapped in rubber bands.) But this is dreck. (The pastor drops this object to the floor of the nave.)
Why do I say that? It may tie me emotionally to the past. But should that be my focus? And what should be my focus? (Slight pause.)
For these 23 plus years I have done my best as I tried to focus not on the idea that God is present to me, walks with me. I have tied to focus on the idea that God is present to us— all of us. God walks with us— all of us.
And yes, at times I have been discouraged. At times Paul had to have been discouraged also or the Apostle to the Gentiles would have never written (quote:) “we do not give into discouragement, we do not lose heart.”
And we, you and I, should not be discouraged. We, you and I, should not lose heart. Why?
(Quote:) “We have this ministry through God’s mercy, we do not give into discouragement, we do not lose heart.” And that, my friends, is not dreck.
Ministry here, in this place, at this time, is granted to us by God and God is with us. God does walk with us. Amen.
03/03/2019
United Church of Christ, First Congregational, Norwich, New York
ENDPIECE: It is the practice of the Pastor to speak after the Closing Hymn, but before the Choral Response and Benediction. This is an précis of what was said: “I am going to say something about my process in preaching. That’s different. Often I don’t say anything about that. I usually work a month or two ahead in planning sermons. I decide on which reading I will preach, I formulate a sermon title and I make notes to myself as to where I think I might go with a sermon. And then I sit down with Mary Williams and shs pushes me. ‘What do you mean by that?’she says. And she helps me think it through. In any case, the note I made over a month ago said: ‘We need to daily realize Christ is with us as we do the work and the will of God. This is a message of the Transfiguration and Paul understood hope is central because of the reality of the Christ. The Transfiguration story— it really is just a story— but it is meant to help us and give language with which we can express a foretaste of the reality of the Risen Christ.’”
BENEDICTION: God heals and restores. God grants to us the grace and the talent to witness to the love God has for us. So let us live in the light God offers. And, therefore, let us be ready as we go into the world, for we are baptized in the power of the Spirit. And may the peace of Christ, which surpasses understanding, keep our minds and hearts in the companionship and will of the Holy Spirit, this day and forever more. Amen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)